Who’s Who in the RPAS Regulatory Environment
- krdroneworks
- Dec 10, 2025
- 4 min read
By: [ Col (ret) Bernie Derbach, KR Droneworks ]

Understanding
the
"Alphabet Soup"
Behind Your Drone Regulations
If you fly a drone in Canada, you live by the Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs) Part IX. But have you ever wondered why the rules are written the way they are? Why does a Special Flight Operations Certificate (SFOC) require such specific risk assessments? Why are training standards evolving?
Transport Canada doesn’t operate in a vacuum. The rules you follow today are the downstream result of a massive global effort to standardize aviation safety.
To navigate the future of your drone business—especially if you plan to fly BVLOS (Beyond Visual Line of Sight) or complex missions—you need to know the players. Here is your guide to the "Who's Who" of the RPAS regulatory world.
1. The Global Architect: ICAO
International Civil Aviation Organization
Think of ICAO as the United Nations of aviation (because that is exactly what it is). Headquartered right here in Montreal, ICAO sets the Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) for global aviation.
Their Role: ICAO ensures that the skies look the same legally whether you are in Canada, Germany, or Japan. They prevent a fragmented world where every country has radically different rules.
Influence on TC: Canada is a signatory to the Chicago Convention, which means Transport Canada is treaty-bound to harmonize our regulations with ICAO standards.
The Drone Connection: ICAO is currently building the framework for international RPAS operations (like flying a cargo drone from Seattle to Vancouver). When you see TC changing terms or updating definitions, it is often to align with ICAO's global "dictionary" to ensure Canadian pilots speak the same language as the rest of the world.
2. The Risk Experts: JARUS
Joint Authorities for Rule-making on Unmanned Systems
If ICAO is the architect, JARUS is the specialist engineering firm. This is a group of experts from National Aviation Authorities (including Transport Canada) dedicated entirely to unmanned systems.

Their Role: They solve the technical problems that traditional aviation rules can't handle. Their "crown jewel" contribution is SORA (Specific Operations Risk Assessment).
Influence on TC: This is arguably the biggest influence on complex Canadian drone ops. Transport Canada’s approach to SFOC applications for BVLOS is heavily based on the SORA methodology developed by JARUS.
Why it Matters to You: If you want to fly outside the standard rules (complex ops), you aren't just following a checklist; you are proving safety. You are likely using a risk model derived from JARUS work. Understanding SORA is effectively understanding how Transport Canada thinks about risk.
3. The Quality Standard: ISO
International Organization for Standardization
ISO does not write laws; they write the "Gold Standard" for how things should be done. While JARUS and ICAO talk to regulators, ISO talks to the industry.
Their Role: They create voluntary standards for manufacturing, operations, and training (specifically ISO 21384-3 for procedures and ISO 23665 for training).
Influence on TC: Transport Canada regulations are often "performance-based." This means TC tells you what to achieve (e.g., "Ensure the pilot is competent"), but not exactly how to do it. ISO fills that gap.
The Training Link: When an RPAS Training School says they are "ISO Compliant," they are telling Transport Canada, "We don't just meet the minimums; we follow a globally recognized rigorous structure." As we move toward RPAS Operator Certificates (RPOC), citing ISO standards in your operations manual is a powerful way to prove to TC that your organization is professional and safe.
4. The Lawmaker: Transport Canada (TC)
Civil Aviation Directorate
The "Boss." Transport Canada takes the high-level goals from ICAO, the risk methodologies from JARUS, and the operational realities of Canada’s geography to write the CARs.
The Synthesis:
CARs Part IX is the legal text you must follow.
TP 15263 is the knowledge requirement for pilots.
Advisory Circulars (ACs) are the guidance documents that often translate those complex JARUS/ICAO concepts into plain English for Canadian operators.
How They All Connect (The "Why")
Why does this matter to a pilot on the ground? Because the industry is moving from "Prescriptive" rules (do exactly X) to "Performance" rules (prove you can do X safely).
Organization | The Function | The Output | How it hits your Logbook |
ICAO | Harmonization | SARPs (Standards) | Ensures your license definitions match global norms. |
JARUS | Risk Method | SORA | The logic used to approve your SFOC / BVLOS permit. |
ISO | Quality Assurance | ISO 21384 / 23665 | The "Best Practices" you put in your Ops Manual to get approved. |
Transport Canada | Enforcement | CARs Part IX | The actual regulation you fly by every day. |
The Bottom Line
When you are writing your SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) or applying for an SFOC, you aren't just satisfying a bureaucrat in Ottawa. You are participating in a global safety framework.

Operators who align their manuals with ISO standards and understand the JARUS risk models will find their path to regulatory approval much smoother than those who simply try to do the bare minimum required by the CARs.





Comments